1. Instruction

Monday June 11th, 3. 30 - 5. 00 p. m.

Evaluation in 3 subject groups:

German - English - Geography

 This evaluation is important for various reasons as we have

 1. to pin point successes/ failures

2. to aim at suggestions for improvements/ideas for future projects.

3. to use it as the basis for Tuesday's work.

 Please be as precise as possible, and remember it is vital that you evaluate each item stated on the list.

 The secretary in each group is asked to make a brief summary in the plenary at 5 o’clock, and hand in a written version of the results which can be photocopied and hopefully handed out Tuesday morning.

 We are aware of the fact, that we have very little time, but still, if you can manage, it would definitely be of great help, especially for our colleagues only participating on Tuesday.

Lone Hagen / Kirsten M. Anttila

2. Evaluation guidelines

2a. Time schedule

Make a rough outline for what has been accomplished since the 3rd ESP meeting:

 1. For how long and when has each of the following taken place?:

a. Planning with colleagues abroad (at home)
b. Designing projects
c. Carrying out projects

 2. Time allocated for each theme (project?)

a. too short? why? for students / teachers
b. too long? why? for students / teachers
c. adequate?
d. suggestions for improvement

3. When during the school year is it preferable to cooperate?

 2b. Themes/Topics

Descriptions 

                        1. Title ot the theme

o        short description
o        which schools?
o        which teachers?
o        which classes?
o        which subjects involved?

                                  2. Was the theme right for the class level as for

         a. contents
b. language level (foreign language?)

                        3. Were the "matching" of classes in the other countries satisfactory?

o        successes - give examples
o        failures - give examples
o        suggestions for future projects: what to consider when being "linked/matched"?

 2c. Results

What did the students learn, that they would not have been able to learn, had they only had access to "ordinary" teaching facilities?

 o        What was the outcome for the teachers involved?...

o        How did it affect your way of teaching?
o        Did this cooperation enhance your teaching?
o        Other...

2d. Golden rules for cooperation....

State some rules that to you are essential when using telematics...

fast feed back, hints when somebody is ill, etc....

2e. Technical problems.....

         a. Which ones did you run into?
             Could they have been overcome with more guidance?.....
         b. Suggestions for improvements

2f. Organization / Coordination

Participants in the Evaluation:

German: 

Bild 1 :Lone Hagen - Mogens Hillig - Thomas Peters -Ivan Soldo
Bild 2: Kirsten Petersen - Thomas Peters - Ivan Soldo
Bild 3: Birte Sivertsen - Esther Mackeprang - Anna Juhl - Thomas Peters
Bild 4: Annie Ring-Knudsen - Thomas Peters

Secretary: Nina Lund
Observers: Susanne Erichsen

 English:

 Hugo DeFauwe, Philip Stokes

 Secretary: Pauline Meijer

 Geography:

 Toon Claassen, Birgitte Geilager

 Secretary: Birgitte Geilager

Technique I Demonstration of LEARN etc.

 Henk Sligte, Aad Nienhuis, Benita Compostela, Mogens Eriksen, Chris Johnson, Kirsten M. Anttila

 Secretary: Chris Johnson